This should all sound familiar. It is a precursor to The International Building Exhibition Berlin (IBA), the massive urban reconstruction effort of the 1980s which I have been engaged with for many years. Many of the ideas are so obviously visible,
from the form of the urban townhouses to the postmodern public buildings.
But it largely fails. We saw few people walking around,
using the new plazas that no doubt were presented with beautiful drawings
wherein people were filling the streets, buying things, talking watching
children play. My photographs re
unintentionally filled with no one – not on the beautiful benches, or in the
outdoor church seat. No one, nowhere.
And yet, I returned to Berlin recently, where the ideas of
Ungers and the whole movement for reusing traditional ideas in town planning
took hold on the largest scale , in the 1980s, just a few years after
Gibellina. In Berlin, I keep thinking of
the Venturi dictum: “Almost
alright.” Most of the IBA architecture
is not great, in the sense that individually, none of them rock the world
(other than Libeskind’s Jewish Museum, which was not precisely an IBA project, and now look cliched after Libeskind's xerox copies in other cities around the word),
but it is “alright.” It houses people, helps reknit the war-torn area, reestablishes
the street, looks like it fits into a long tradition of Berlin apartment
buildings. It has done its job.
Could the postmodern ideals of “critical reconstruction” of
the urban environment simply not be workable in a small town?
No comments:
Post a Comment